Muse Wonder Full
The stronger Wonder variant, scoring 56 on the Intelligence Index, level with Claude Sonnet 5.5 at max effort. Meta does not sell it through the API.
Muse Code Power Usage ($50/mo) and Maximum Usage ($200/mo) only
Mu
Meta · Coding tools
Muse Code
Meta’s multi-agent coding tool for the terminal and CI, built for its Muse models, with approvals and an OS sandbox on from the first run. It is the only way to use Muse Wonder Full.
Best for
Developers who want a low-cost coding subscription, or access to Muse Wonder Full, which is not sold through the API.
Worth knowing
Wonder Full needs the $50 Power Usage plan or above. Pay-per-token use through the Meta Model API is cheaper with Contributor models, but Meta uses those prompts and outputs to improve its products.
Plans & free tier
Free: No free subscription is listed; you can pay per token through the Meta Model API instead.
- Everyday Usage$5/mo
Muse Spark, Muse Wonder and Muse Image; 10–50 prompts every five hours.
- High Usage$15/mo
5x Everyday usage and more multimodal inputs.
- Power Usage$50/mo
20x Everyday usage and Muse Wonder Full.
- Maximum Usage$200/mo
80x Everyday usage.
US list prices before tax, checked . Vendor source ↗
A task to try
Give it one reproducible bug and a test command on the cheapest plan, then check the patch and how much of the five-hour allowance it used.
Models to know
Practical guides
Latest Muse Code news
No stories mention Muse Code in the current feeds. Browse all AI news →
Alternatives
Anthropic
Claude Code
Compare a terminal coding agent on the same repository task, patch and tests.
OpenAI
Codex
Try another coding agent that may already be included in a ChatGPT plan.
GoGoogle
Google Antigravity
Compare a free coding-agent platform before paying for a subscription.